找回密码
 注册
Simdroid-非首页
楼主: 剑不如人

[计算分析] geo-slope的seep可不可以算水位骤降的渗流稳定?

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-8-17 12:59:27 | 显示全部楼层 来自 湖北宜昌
谢谢!楼上的兄弟!
回复 不支持

使用道具 举报

发表于 2007-8-17 13:20:37 | 显示全部楼层 来自 湖北宜昌
Simdroid开发平台
basara
你用的是2007版本的,我用的是2004版本的,所以“在 keyin菜单,分析设定parent选取计算好的渗流模型文件,或者other geostudio analysis”
这些项都没有呢
郁闷中!
我上面贴出来的那几个图都没有人帮我分析一下哦1 :'( :'(
回复 不支持

使用道具 举报

发表于 2007-9-6 15:33:00 | 显示全部楼层 来自 上海闸北区
SLOPE/W 2007中用多步不排水强度法分析水位骤降问题,比2004版本有所改进。

http://geo.cntech.com.cn/news/2007-08/geo-1731.html

把SLOPE/W和SEEP/W结合起来考虑水位骤降问题是很方便的。
回复 不支持

使用道具 举报

发表于 2007-9-21 14:37:56 | 显示全部楼层 来自 上海徐汇区
在SLOPE/W2007的用户手册,有专门对于水位骤降的说明:
3.15 Rapid Drawdown Analysis Methods
Using SLOPE/W, stability during rapid drawdown can be modeled in two approaches, namely the “effective strength” approach (simple and rigorous) and the “staged undrained strength” approach.
In the effective strength approach, the effective stress parameters are used to compute the effective shear strength of the embankment during rapid drawdown. The advantage of this approach is that effective shear strength parameters are used which are fundamentally better. The disadvantage of this approach is the extra work required to estimate the pore water pressures within materials during the drawdown process.
In the staged undrained strength method, the shear strength is evaluated based on the total stress parameters and consequently, the requirements associated with the estimation of the pore water pressure conditions for effective stress analysis can be avoided. The disadvantage of this approach is that total stress parameters are used and these total stress parameters are not commonly available. Furthermore, the hydraulic properties of the materials are ignored and the stability of the embankment dam at different times during the drawdown process cannot be evaluated.
rigorous “effective strength” approach需要借助SEEP/W2007计算水位骤降后坝体内的水压力消散,实际上simple “effective strength” approach是最危险的情况,即库区水位降了,但坝体内的水压力还保持不变。

The Staged Undrained Strength Method
The “3-stage” undrained strength method proposed by Duncan, Wright and Wong (1990) has been implemented in SLOPE/W. In short, the 3-stage analysis method can be summarized as follows:
The first stage involves the stability analysis of the embankment before drawdown when the water level is high and the pore water pressures in the materials are at a steady state condition. Both the effective normal stress and shear stress along the slip surface are used to determine the undrained shear strength for materials that do not drain freely.
The second stage involves the stability analysis of the embankment after drawdown when the water level is low and the pore water pressures in the materials are at a steady state condition. The effective normal stress obtained from stage two together with the effective strength parameters are used to compute the drained (effective) strength along the slip surface.
Both the drained and undrained strengths at the slice base along the slip surface are then compared, and the smaller strength is chosen as the computed shear strength which will be used in the third stage. The comparison is needed in order to avoid using undrained strengths greater than drained strengths, which cannot be mobilized if cavitation or drainage occurs (Duncan, Wright and Wong (1990).
The third stage involves conducting a stability analysis using the computed shear strengths and the final drawdown water level. The computed factor of safety from the first and second stages are ignored and only the factor of safety computed from the third stage analysis is used to represent the stability after rapid drawdown.

[ 本帖最后由 basara 于 2007-9-21 14:41 编辑 ]
回复 不支持

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-1-3 20:48:21 | 显示全部楼层 来自 江苏南京
to basara:能不能发个2007给我啊?
回复 不支持

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-1-5 23:05:39 | 显示全部楼层 来自 江苏南京
有没有geoslope的群啊,有问题就可以直接请教了
诸位楼上的大虾们,能不能加我qq:17837483啊,需要你们帮帮忙!!
回复 不支持

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-1-6 22:43:26 | 显示全部楼层 来自 湖北宜昌
45276031
回复 不支持

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-9-17 16:49:24 | 显示全部楼层 来自 武汉大学
8# changqing
多谢版主的解答
回复 不支持

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-5 16:36:14 | 显示全部楼层 来自 云南昆明
很多问题不懂,请高手加我QQ:18066165
回复 不支持

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-8-4 09:51:38 | 显示全部楼层 来自 四川成都
有什么SLOPE/W2007的专业群啊
回复 不支持

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-8-8 20:26:01 | 显示全部楼层 来自 武汉大学
20# basara

对于水位骤降过程,画边界条件的时候,若是选中Fn#,potentail seepage face review是否要勾选?

看了一下理论手册131页的说明,好像是要勾选的,将水头边界条件转化为流量边界条件,以搜索库水水位以上的潜在渗流面。就是不太清楚如果不勾选的话,水位以上的点的水头要小于该点的y坐标,此时程序又是如何考虑的?
回复 不支持

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-8-11 15:40:39 | 显示全部楼层 来自 湖北武汉
学习了,正在研究渗流
回复 不支持

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-9-28 20:33:02 | 显示全部楼层 来自 华南理工大学
顶顶顶,谢谢楼主,非常有用的资料
回复 不支持

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-10-11 22:39:14 | 显示全部楼层 来自 重庆
mark,要仔细看看
回复 不支持

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-4-17 14:29:23 | 显示全部楼层 来自 浙江嘉兴
工作需要,进来学习一下!
回复 不支持

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Simapps系列直播

Archiver|小黑屋|联系我们|仿真互动网 ( 京ICP备15048925号-7 )

GMT+8, 2024-9-20 05:41 , Processed in 0.041778 second(s), 8 queries , Gzip On, MemCache On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表