- 积分
- 133
- 注册时间
- 2006-1-10
- 仿真币
-
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
|
楼主 |
发表于 2007-9-7 17:49:58
|
显示全部楼层
来自 江苏无锡
Analysis of smoke movement in the Aquatics Centre
Protecting 'The Water Cube'Fire Engineering’s Crucial RoleWithout Arup’s fire engineers, the Water Cube’s structure as we know it could not have been used as the National Aquatics Centre for the 2008 Beijing Olympics.
After the innovative design was voted the winner of an international competition judged by the people of China, the challenge for Arup Fire and the design team was to demonstrate that the design provided for an acceptable level of safety.
As the Water Cube did not follow the prescriptive rules of the Chinese Building Code, this involved complex analysis, the use of research data, detailed reporting, and presentations to the Chinese authorities.
The fire engineering design received formal approval in early 2004. It is the first Olympic site in Beijing to receive approval for the fire engineering, and has set a precedent and direction for future Olympic projects in the area.
The Innovative Facade - ETFEETFE, the innovative material being used as the 'skin' of the Water Cube, is an amazing material with excellent insulation properties, however it is combustible.
As the Chinese Building Code does not allow for the use of combustible materials for façades, Arup Fire needed to address concerns about its performance in fire, the potential fire scenarios, and the consequences for safety. This allowed the development of appropriate criteria for material selection to provide an acceptable level of safety.
The greatest attribute of ETFE in fire is that is shrinks away from a fire, thus effectively ‘self-venting’ and letting smoke out of the building.
Keeping People SafeIt is estimated that 20,000 people, including spectators, athletes, officials and support crews will use the Water Cube at any one time during the Olympics. To cater for these numbers, the Chinese Building Code would have required 200 metres of exit doors, the equivalent of two sides of the building. Not only would this have significantly impacted on the architectural look of the Water Cube, it would have been a security issue.
Knowing that people prefer to enter and exit from the same place, the fire design encompasses open circulation routes rather than enclosed circulation routes, and incorporates appropriate fire safety systems like sprinklers and smoke exhaust. This makes the building safer for longer and allows the more open and familiar circulation routes to be used for egress.
The egress and circulation routes were specifically designed to maximise net lettable area, provide pleasant and efficient open circulation routes, and minimise external doors adversely affecting the external architecture.
The fire engineering has delivered the best of both worlds. The Water Cube retains its architectural integrity and is a magnificent venue for users, all within an environment that leads in fire safety performance. |
|