国外论坛关于造船软件的比较和议论

cqmygysdss

国外论坛关于造船软件的比较和议论

View Poll Results: Which program(s) do you use as your primary hull design software?
Autoship (Autoship Systems Corporation)		13	6.19%
Catia		10	4.76%
DefCar (DefCar Engineering)		0	0%
Delftship		28	13.33%
Fastship (Proteus Engineering)		2	0.95%
HullCAO (HullCAO)		1	0.48%
Hull Form (Blue Peter Marine Systems)		2	0.95%
Maxsurf (Formation Design Systems)		59	28.10%
MultiSurf (Aerohydro)		10	4.76%
Naval Designer		2	0.95%
Prolines (Vacanti Yacht Design)		4	1.90%
ProSurf (New Wave Systems)		3	1.43%
Rhino (Robert McNeel & Assoc.)		53	25.24%
SeaSolution		0	0%
TouchCAD		5	2.38%
Other (please post below)		18	8.57%

[/url]

Quote:
Originally Posted by JosephT
I concur, some of the best modeling tools are not listed. I use Freeship to generate basic hull lines, then import them into NX and do all the detailed design there. NX has a shipbuilding module, but it's overkill for most smaller boat design applications.
Originally Posted by rocknrule
There are 3 not even listed that are way, way ahead of the rest.
PTC CADDS 5
UGS NX
Catia

I concur, some of the best modeling tools are not listed. I use Freeship to generate basic hull lines, then import them into NX and do all the detailed design there. NX has a shipbuilding module, but it's overkill for most smaller boat design applications.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JosephT
I concur, some of the best modeling tools are not listed. I use Freeship to generate basic hull lines, then import them into NX and do all the detailed design there. NX has a shipbuilding module, but it's overkill for most smaller boat design applications.

Similar process here using Rhinomarine for hull design then SolidWorks to finish. It is possible to creat a hull in SolidWorks, but after dozens and dozens of attempts, it's apparent that they still are not quite there. The nice thing now, however, is that SolidWorks is semi-parametric now with Rhino. I can make a change in the Rhino model and propogate that through SolidWorks. Very handy.

Problem with CADDS5 (besides being ancient) and Catia are the hugemongous expense in the purchase of the software and the very steep learning curve. Both of which are totally unneccessary for pleasure craft but are probably worth the investment for large-scale ship design.
__________________
Rick Beddoe
s/v Soñadora, 1978 Baba 30
Senior Designer, Sons Creative

"Study nature, love nature, stay close to nature. It will never fail you" - Frank Lloyd Wright

[url=http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/design-software/best-marine-design-software-hull-modeling-2008-09-a-22030-8.html]http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/design-software/best-marine-design-software-hull-modeling-2008-09-a-22030-8.html

Quote:Originally Posted by apex1
Well Catia is really not for free either and the learning curve is very steep too!

Originally Posted by apex1 Well Catia is really not for free either and the learning curve is very steep too!

Exactly why I'd choose Catia over NX
__________________
Rick Beddoe
s/v Soñadora, 1978 Baba 30
Senior Designer, Sons Creative

"Study nature, love nature, stay close to nature. It will never fail you" - Frank Lloyd Wright

chgdong213

这个权威度高吗

shanvens

基本上用Rhino的确实挺多，小巧方便，而且功能强大。
相反的，tribon貌似用的人并不多，不像国内那么迷信。。。几乎到达了一个神化的程度

kalvens

这个权威度还是可以的，不过LZ也不用全都拷过来，而且人家只是说建船壳用什么软件好