比较雷的专家评审意见

寒雁东篱畔

看了一些硕士答辩专家评审意见，有些感觉比较雷。。。。


专家一：论文内容看导师的指导作用是很出se的，但论文未能涉及，建议稍作形式上的修改。（修改）

就因为没突出导师的作用，就要重修改。。。。


专家一：1、临床和实验部分内容题目大、内容多，不可能在三年内全部完成好这么多工作，  。。。（不同意答辩）


专家一 2、一般来说，《XXX》书所论应该用“曰”，XXX人所论应该用“云”    （修改）


专家一：该文作为博士论文无论从内容上和选择指标包括实验研究方面都显得不足，如果作为留学生博士论文，请按贵校博士论文的格式书写要求认真修改后按贵校对留学博士生的要求进行答辩。（修改）

这个，有点雷。。。。

benjackxu

ZT ，看了轰得你跳楼，呵呵
Dear Prof. xxx,

A Principal Editor has evaluated your manuscript titled

Effect of xxxxxxx.

and I regret to inform you that, based on the comments, it will not be
possible to further consider your manuscript for publication in Journal of
Materials Research. The comments of the editor are enclosed for your
consideration. I hope the information provided by the editor will be helpful
in future studies.

Sincerely,

Dr. Gordon Pike
Associate Editor, JMR

Principal Editor Comments for the Author:
I have read this manuscript and think it is of very poor quality.  First of
all, the xxx system has been characterized in detail for the past xxxxx
and is a model xxxxx system.  The microstructure and
mechanical properties including effects of prior strain etc have all been
characterized in detail by many researchers.  So there is nothing new here.

Next, these authors are drawing poor conclusions based on poor experiments
(their bright field TEM analysis using multi-beam is appalling!)  It is well
known that xxxx is a plate-shaped precipitate!  Any beginning book in
metallurgy (like Ashby's Introduction to Materials Science) will verify
this.  Yet, the authors refer to it as xxxx.  Then they calculate
dimensions of the precipitates based on projected 2D images without caring
for crystallographic orientations or g-vectors in the image.  THey talk
about xxxx being present or absent without adopting 2-beam
conditions!! There are 3 variants of this precipitate due to cube-on-cube
relationships and no attention is given to anything like this.  THen they
talk of growth based on xxxxx when all of this can
be artifacts of projection and there is no discussion of error bars on
measurements.  Single xxxxx curves are compared and a point is made
of elongations varying betweenxxxx etc and these are all well
within scatter, especially in xxxx where grain boundary precipitates
will participate in stress concentration and crack nucleation (There has to
be a lot of xxxxx in xxxxx).

I could go on and on but see no point.  I do not want to waste reviewers
time with this kind of paper.

[ 本帖最后由 benjackxu 于 2008-5-5 21:09 编辑 ]

寒雁东篱畔

要求汉语。。。。。

lilulilu

原帖由 benjackxu 于 2008-5-5 21:07 发表
ZT ，看了轰得你跳楼，呵呵
Dear Prof. xxx,

A Principal Editor has evaluated your manuscript titled

Effect of xxxxxxx.

and I regret to inform you that, based on the comments, it will not b ...

这个。。需要心理承受能力很强，说话很直。。好害怕

FreddyMusic

偶也来个经典的！

what is experiment ? --- by Unknown

The Eleven Phases of an Experiment

1. Wild enthusiasm
2. Exciting commitments
3. Total confusion
4. Re-evaluation of goals
5. Disillusionment
6. Cross-accusations
7. Search for the guilty
8. Punish the innocent
9. Promote the non-participants
10. Verbally assassinate visible leaders
11. Write and publish the report