- 积分
- 33
- 注册时间
- 2005-6-2
- 仿真币
-
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
|
发表于 2009-3-31 08:12:34
|
显示全部楼层
来自 美国
I did a check on Knuth's work, The Art of Programming, vol1. It used a comma at bottom, see page 517 (English version): "Incidentally, T. H. O'Beirne pointed out that the date of Easter repeats with a period of exactly 5,700,000 years. " Also, for vol 2, all used this way (tons of examples): for example, page 405, ... "and there are only 31,556,952,000,000" ...page 2, "it will not always have exactly 100,000 zeros, 100,000 ones, etc. In fact, chances of this are quite slim; a sequence of such sequences will have this character on the average. "
In Knuth's another book, concrete mathematics, p76, I also found that he used 1,000 in a Table. In his other book: Mathematics for the Analysis of Algorithms, there is no such cases with large number for identification of usage.
I did not do exhausted check on Donald E. Knuth's work because I did not read his book in the past and just did search from pdf and djvu files. Please correct me if I am wrong.
43# FreddyMusic |
|